Mysticism at the Mall

Mysticism at the mall

Monday March 8, 2010    Rod Dreher

Ross Douthat’s wonderful column yesterday explores the cheapening of mysticism via the mass market. Excerpt:

Mysticism is dying, and taking true religion with it. Monasteries have dwindled. Contemplative orders have declined. Our religious leaders no longer preach the renunciation of the world; our culture scoffs at the idea. The closest most Americans come to real asceticism is giving up chocolate, cappuccinos, or (in my own not-quite-Francis-of-Assisi case) meat for lunch for Lent.This, at least, is the stern message of Luke Timothy Johnson, writing in the latest issue of the Catholic journal Commonweal. As society has become steadily more materialistic, Johnson declares, our churches have followed suit, giving up on the ascetic and ecstatic aspects of religion and emphasizing only the more worldly expressions of faith. Conservative believers fixate on the culture wars, religious liberals preach social justice, and neither leaves room for what should be a central focus of religion — the quest for the numinous, the pursuit of the unnamable, the tremor of bliss and the dark night of the soul.

 Before I get back to Ross, it’s worth taking a short detour through Luke Timothy Johnson’s essay, which argues that religion without mysticism is dead. He writes that yes, there is a grand battle today between the forces of religion and anti-religion. But:

More significant even than that struggle, though, is the clash occurring within religious traditions. The battle within each of the three great monotheistic religions is between the exoteric and esoteric versions of each. In my view, the contest is already so far advanced as virtually to be decided. But that is getting ahead of ourselves.As the name suggests, the exoteric focuses on external expressions of religion. Its concern is for the observance of divine commandments, the performance of public ritual, and the celebration of great festivals. In its desire for a common creed and practice, its tropism is toward religious law, and it seeks to shape a visible and moral society molded by such law. To form a visible community publicly obedient to divine command requires an explicit social vision, and exoteric religion is overtly political. The goal, after all, is the realization of the kingdom of God as an empirical reality; the point is religion in its public dimension.

The esoteric, in contrast, finds the point of religion less in external performance than in the inner experience and devotion of the heart; less in the public liturgy than in the individual’s search for God. The esoteric dimension of religion privileges the transforming effect of asceticism and prayer. It seeks an experience of the divine more intense, more personal, and more immediate than any made available by law or formal ritual. The esoteric element in religion finds expression above all in mysticism. Mystics pursue the inner reality of the relationship between humans and God: they long for true knowledge of what alone is ultimately real, and desire absolute love for what is alone infinitely desirable.

 Johnson argues that healthy religion balances the mystical (esoteric) with the active (exoteric) dimensions … but that the mystical was suppressed for so long that it now re-emerges as a form of pop spirituality. But, he continues, the esoteric unanchored in an exoteric tradition (Christian, Jewish, Islamic) amounts to the spirituality of flibbertigibbets. (Or, as I would put it, a woo-woo gloss on Moralistic Therapeutic Deism). As Ross points out, though, just because true mysticism has been marginalized within formal religion doesn’t mean the hunger for contact with the numinous has disappeared. Pop mysticism is everywhere in our culture. The craving for it is real, and we are wrong to dismiss it or mock it outright. But we seem to content ourselves with satisfying that legitimate hunger with junk food. Here’s Ross:

By making mysticism more democratic, we’ve also made it more bourgeois, more comfortable, and more dilettantish. It’s become something we pursue as a complement to an upwardly mobile existence, rather than a radical alternative to the ladder of success. Going to yoga classes isn’t the same thing as becoming a yogi; spending a week in a retreat center doesn’t make me Thomas Merton or Thérèse of Lisieux. Our kind of mysticism is more likely to be a pleasant hobby than a transformative vocation.

Boy, does this ever speak to me.   (Read the rest of the article on Beliefnet)

Broken Genome Promises

[]  Chuck Colson – BreakPoint

Broken Genome Promises
Identifying the Weak

June 28, 2010

Ten years ago, then-president Clinton told Americans that mapping the human genome would “revolutionize the diagnosis, prevention and treatment of most, if not all, human diseases.”

But as the New York Times reported recently, a decade after the mapping of the human genome, the “genetic map [has yielded] few new cures.”

The primary goal of the project—discovering the “genetic roots of common disease” and then finding cures—”remains elusive.” In fact, the Times reports, “geneticists are almost back to square one in knowing where to look for the roots of common disease.”

Unfortunately, there’s more to this story than yet another case of failing to live up to the scientists’ hype. That’s because while genetics’ potential to heal may be almost back to square one, the same can’t be said for its potential to harm.

Genomics may not be able to cure illnesses, but it can prevent illnesses by identifying those in utero who are genetically at risk.

Take the recent announcement that scientists had “uncovered dozens of previously unknown genetic mutations that contribute to autism in children.”

Notwithstanding what you may have heard, these findings bring us no closer to “curing” autism. On the contrary, the study shows how difficult it will be to “design drug therapies that work across a wide range of autistic spectrum disorders.”

Now it doesn’t take a genetics scientist to figure out the road we’re heading down. If we can identify fetuses who carry genetic markers for autism, but we can’t find a cure for them, what’s likely to happen? We’ll see an increase in abortions. Exactly what happened to people with Down syndrome—92 percent of whom now, after prenatal diagnosis, follow with an abortion.

There is no reason to believe that prenatal diagnoses of autism, or even a predisposition to autism, would be all that different. Prospective parents of children with less-challenging genetic prognoses abort their unborn children in a majority of the cases.

Raising an autistic child—whose dependence may extend beyond the age of 18 and whose needs can exhaust even the most dedicated and loving parent—is a scary prospect.

As I’ve also discovered, however, with my grandson Max, it can be a huge blessing.

Now this doesn’ t take into account expense. We know that keeping medical costs down right now is a national priority. So it’s easy to understand why parents are strongly encouraged to undergo genetic screening. The least-expensive way to care for people with special needs is to prevent them from being born. So the pressure will mount on parents to abort babies with genetic issues.

If this sounds familiar, that’s because it was the “near future” depicted in the film Gattaca. That came out three years before Clinton’s announcement. Film director Andrew Niccol saw where our brave new world of genetic screening would lead. A tool to enhance human life could end up becoming a tool to eliminate it.

Folks, it comes down simply to this. Human life is either sacred, made in the image of God, and therefore worthy of our protection in all circumstances, or it is merely the result of chance, an accumulation of genetic material to be manipulated—or even eliminated—according to the dictates of science and the bottom line.

There is no in-between.

Theology and Mysticism in the Tradition of the Eastern Church

The writing of Vladimir Lossky is widely considered to be ‘difficult’ or ‘challeging’ but it is far less difficult than the subject matter to which he addresses himself. Indeed, with patience and curiosity (the necessary attitude of anyone who wishes to learn) the reader will find a breath-taking opening into the higher reaches of consciousness – where human consciousness touches the divine.

Please explore his introduction to Orthodox Christian mysticism.

ODD Humanitarianism

 Read the whole article on Townhall.com  by Mike Adams

I have a former student who has found the perfect job. She’s working with troubled youths in a faith-based program that allows her to finally put her psychology degree to use – a full eight years after she graduated from college. She likes the job, but she called my office recently to vent about a boy who suffers from Oppositional Defiance Disorder (ODD).

I have a B.A. and an M.S. in psychology. But I must confess that I needed some explanation of ODD because it wasn’t yet a disorder when I studied psychology back in the 1980s. So I asked my former student simply to describe the behavior of the boy with ODD. The conversation went something like this:

Erica (not real name): He is constantly pitching a fit over nothing – or nearly nothing. He argues with everything I say and there is no such thing as a rule he does not question.

Me: So, in other words, the boy is a jerk.

Erica: No, he has ODD. I mean, he actively defies and refuses to comply with every request made by every adult. I mean that literally. And he does it just to annoy us and to upset us. But he won’t take responsibility for his behavior or his mistakes. It’s never his fault.

Me: So, in other words, the boy is a jerk.

Erica: No, I said he has ODD. He’s also easily annoyed by other people. And he’s full of resentment and anger.

Me: So, in other words, the boy is a jerk.

Erica: No, there’s more to it than that. I know he has ODD because of the hateful words he uses when he’s upset. He is just so spiteful and so bent on gaining revenge against anyone he thinks has wronged him.

Me: So, in other words, the boy is a jerk.

Erica: I guess you’re right. He is a jerk.

They’re Not Spoiled Brats – They’re ODD

In a previous article, entitled “Why Can’t We Reform our Criminals”, we talked about the upsurge of recidivism since the therapeutic mentality took over the task of transitioning criminals back into society. According to this group, it’s parents who didn’t attend every single soccer game, parents who didn’t tolerate their children’s individuality and let them be themselves, or in other words; parents who didn’t grant the kids’ every wish who are to blame. Plus, of course, another major factor is “Society” in general. We, as a society, just didn’t care enough, weren’t tolerant enough, and expected too much. Gasp… there was even competition in schools and – gasp – children were actually grade-ranked on their academic performance. So, there’s the root cause of crime. It’s not the criminals’ fault! It’s everybody else’s fault. It’s society’s fault.

However, typical of the therapeutic mentality, they’ve got it all upside down. Studies have shown that those who chose crime – yes, they chose crime, it wasn’t the only alternative – did so because of the very things that are now accepted as normal child rearing patterns. Let the children “be themselves,” don’t burden them with “unrealistic expectations” and when they inevitably make mistakes, don’t criticize them. Or at least blame the schools or society, but never, ever, ask the child to take responsibility for their own actions. Respect for parents and authority are just “old fashioned” notions. Instead, we should embrace the “progressive” notion that children already have within themselves all the knowledge they need. They don’t need the advice and counsel of grown-ups; they just need to be “empowered” to bring out their natural, inherent goodness. They won’t benefit from self-respect, but they’ll wither without self-esteem.

Read the rest of the article.

The lure of the mystical path

From Ashland to Portland, the Orthodox tradition is drawing Oregonians to its ancient depths

By Alice Tallmadge, Correspondent
The Oregonian, Sunday, April 9, 2000

EUGENE — The Saturday night buzz is revving outside the doors of St. Eugene Orthodox Church in the Whiteaker neighborhood. Motors race. Doors slam. Nearby taverns begin to fill with eager revelers. But inside the walls of the humble, dome-topped church, an otherworldly peace reigns. Pungent incense hangs in the air. Gold-flecked icons, lit by flickering tapers, line the dark red walls. Women, their long hair covered with scarves, stand on one side of the small nave, men on the other.

They take turns filling the room with plaintive, old-world chants. Other worshippers stand quietly, hands to their sides, heads bowed.

“This is how we worship, to stay concentrated in prayer,” said St. Eugene member Sarah Cowie. “We believe that, during the service, God pours himself out. If you get quiet enough in your mind, you can feel, palpably, his presence.”

The 70 or so members of St. Eugene aren’t immigrants from Russia, Eastern Europe or Greece. They are Eugene-area residents, most of them converts from Protestant sects, who have found solace and sustenance in a tradition that dates back 2,000 years to the early Christian church. Cowie and other St. Eugene members are among the growing numbers of Oregonians who are converting to Orthodoxy.

For years, St. Nicholas Orthodox Church in Portland, established in 1895, was one of few Orthodox churches in the state. In the past 15 years, churches or missions have sprung up in Albany, Ashland, Milwaukie, Oregon City, Eugene and in several Portland neighborhoods. According to the Orthodox Church of America, an umbrella organization for certain Orthodox jurisdictions, at least 150 new parishes in the United States have sprung up in the past 20 years. Nationally, they estimate there are now 2 million to 3 million Orthodox believers.

Faith trumps understanding in the ancient, mystical tradition, which is steeped in rituals such as a sung liturgy, reverence for icons, fasting, sacraments and daily dedication to the spiritual life.

Something more real

One of the tradition’s most powerful attractions to Westerners is its rejection of immediate gratification and living only for the self, said Cowie. She converted 14 years ago after spending years seeking a tradition that would satisfy a spiritual longing she herself could not describe. Orthodoxy offered something different, she said. Something bigger. Something more real.

“It’s very, very deep,” she said. “The people who are attracted to Orthodoxy are people… who are looking for something more, who see the shallowness of our materialistic society.”

Orthodoxy doesn’t ignore the mind and the intellect, Cowie said, but sees the intellect as being seated in the heart. “There is a mystical presence that actually draws us on.”

A hunger for meaning

Youths seem to be drawn to the ancient tradition. When Cowie’s daughter was a teen-ager, Cowie gave her free rein to decide for herself which religious tradition spoke to her. Her daughter, now 21, is an Orthodox nun in a California monastery. “Our children are staying with the church,” said Cowie, who teaches parenting classes at a Eugene nonprofit agency.

The Rev. Michael Boyle, a priest at St. Eugene, said that for some youths the church fills a void that entertainment and other social institutions do not. “Younger people are hungry for authentic Christianity. They are dying inside for something that is real, authentic and that challenges them to have a spiritual life as a Christian,” he said. “Orthodoxy has not lost the mystery. It does not try to answer every question that comes up. It’s real. People feel God.”

The tradition’s emphasis on ritual, prayer and self-examination spoke to an unmet spiritual hunger Rebecca Jaquette and her husband had both felt for years. Like Cowie, Jaquette had experimented with different Christian approaches to worship before she found Orthodoxy. Brought up Presbyterian, “I felt like I didn’t have any tradition,” Jacquette said. “My husband and I knew how to speak ‘Christian-ese,’ but inwardly we felt we were just going through the motions. We didn’t know what we were really doing with our lives.”

From the moment they began attending Orthodox services in Portland, something felt right, Jaquette said. “And as we continued in it, we felt we were worshipping more fully, that we found a place where there was a rhythm to life that was really important.” Now members of St. Eugene, the couple is happy to have rituals and traditions to pass on to their two children, ages 5 and 6 months. “This is what they will know,” Jaquette said.

A split at the beginning

The Eastern and Western Christian traditions split apart in what is known as the Great Schism of 1054. The two branches took very different routes. Whereas the Roman Catholic tradition adhered to a strict hierarchy headed by the pope, the Orthodox Church stayed away from placing one individual at its head. Over the centuries, a host of Orthodox jurisdictions developed. Different ethnic groups, including Greeks, Serbians, Albanians and Russians, added their own customs to the traditional rituals. Still, at the core, “we are all of the same faith,” Evangelatos said.

Michael Spezio, a UO graduate student and a Presbyterian minister, has studied Orthodoxy and has traveled to Mount Athos, a Greek peninsula populated only by monks living in centuries-old monasteries. Spezio said he has come to understand what Orthodoxy contributes to the broad spectrum of Christianity. “I have an appreciation for the mystery that moves through the tradition,” he said. “They don’t seek to intellectualize every last thing. The seek to experience, but not to dissect that experience.

Incorporating the senses

Despite its focus on spirituality, Orthodoxy doesn’t reject the physical realm, said St. Eugene member Catherine Larson. During services the five senses are nourished and purified: candles for sight, incense for smell, bread and wine for taste, kissing of icons for touch, chanting for sound. Church members often fast, but they also join for feasts and communal meals.

“The beauty and theology of Orthodoxy seems more elemental, more practical,” she said. Unlike Catholicism, Orthodox priests who intend to serve parishes must be married before they are ordained.

St. Eugene, said the head priest, the Rev. David Lubliner, is named after a 4th-century Egyptian saint who is celebrated for his selfless hospitality and kindness. “Emperor Constantine called him one of the three great lights of the world,” he said. The church, which also houses a small bookstore, plans to continue its patron saint’s hospitality. It will open a drop-in tea house and plans to help cook for the group Food Not Bombs, which prepares meals for the homeless several times a week.

Coincidentally, the church is situated at the site of another establishment that served wayward pilgrims on the path of life. The former Icky’s Teahouse welcomed social outcasts, runaway youth, substance abusers and anarchists, once even holding a benefit concert for Unabomber Ted Kaczynski.

Today the just-completed stucco church, which took church members two years and hundreds of hours of mostly volunteer labor to build, nuzzles up close to Whiteaker’s social diversity. To the south is an AA social club. To the north a dance studio thuds with flamenco initiates. Nearby is a row of artists’ studios, a Mission homeless shelter, local railroad yards and a notorious drug and skin market strip. St. Eugene will be a place of peace in the center of that swirl, Boyle said, both for its members and anyone on the street looking for a place of rest.

“I know that, through prayer, grace is sent, and that grace resides in the physical building itself,” he said. “As people enter from the street, they sense it. They sense holiness, something different than anything they’ve sensed before. And that is part of our purpose, to bring down that grace from heaven.”

What We Want From Government

Tea Party comments

Peter & Helen Evans

Friends, Americans, Patriots — lend me your ears!

We are gathered here on this beautiful day — not because we are filled with hate — but because we love our country.

Our hearts are breaking as we watch our good, true and beautiful nation being crippled by self-inflicted wounds, crushed under an enormous burden of unnecessary debt and strangled by tighter and tighter regulations.

Although the cancerous growth of government has been happening for a long time, it is happening much more quickly now. Even so, many of our families, friends and neighbors still don’t see this yet. This where we have work to do. This country is its people — “we the people” — ALL the people. So, when we love our country, we also love our neighbors. We don’t want to insult them, hurt their feelings and drive them away from us. We love liberty and we know that only the truth — and constant vigilance — can make us free. We must bring the truth to our families, friends and neighbors in ways that educate, persuade and convince them to do what’s right for this country that IS ALL of us.

Helen and I wrote a review of a movie a few years ago for our young nephews and niece. It was about the movie “John Q.” We offer it as an example of one way to get a discussion going about the truth. Helen is handing out cards right now with a link to it on our website. We hope that it can be helpful for you in your efforts to spread the truth.

An important truth was stated here almost 30 years ago and in these troubled times we need to hear it again. “Government is NOT the solution to our problems. Government IS the problem.”

Is anyone here old enough to remember the “Great Society” project of the 1960′s? Remember the “War on Poverty”? Over a period of about three decades the government spent Trillions (with a “T”) of dollars in an attempt to “eliminate” poverty. What happened? Well, we got MORE broken homes. We got MORE fatherless families. We got MORE unemployment. We got MORE drug abuse. We got MORE crime. We ended up with MORE poverty! Oh yes. Did I mention that we also ended up with MORE government?

OK, that was a long time ago. Look back just a decade or so. We all remember “Affordable Housing” right? Back in the 1990′s government started interfering with the mortgage market to force down interest rates and to compel banks to make insecure loans. Right after we got over the dot-com bubble, the real-estate bubble started blowing up. After a few years, of course, the insecure loans started collapsing in record numbers. By then the securities based on these shaky loans had been sold all over the world and this contributed to the worldwide financial meltdown that we are all “enjoying” right now. OK. So… “affordable housing” results in financial collapse.

It’s a CRISIS!!! Well we “can’t let a crisis go to waste” can we? Quick! We have to DO SOMETHING!!!! No time to stop and think about it. If all that borrowing and spending of the last few decades was a “bad thing,” then we had better borrow five times as much and call it a “stimulus” or a TARP or a bail-out or an “investment in our future.” Then it’ll be a “good thing” — right?

Well, it’s a good thing if you are the government, because now you control the financial sector and the American auto industry. What a relief! Pretty soon “we the people” can count on having “affordable” money and “affordable” cars! What’s the matter? Don’t you have any faith in the government?

Don’t you have any hope? Put your hands into your pockets. See!! you still have change!

Well, watch out now, because the geniuses who brought us “affordable” housing are getting all set up to bring us “affordable” education, “affordable” energy and “affordable” health care. As a very smart man once said, “If you think health care is expensive now, just wait until it’s free!”

The only way we can get government back on its Constitutional track is for ourselves to embody the foundational values of liberty and self-responsibility. The only way for us to embody them is to talk about them, talk about them with our families, friends and neighbors. It will really surprise you, once you start doing this, how many times we actually endorse bad values just because we are swimming in them. They are in TV the movies and the internet. They’re changing the meaning of the words we use. The bad ideas are usually hiding behind good-sounding names like ‘fairness’ and ‘equality,’ like ‘non-judgmentalism,’ ‘tolerance’ and ‘choice.’ Help your families and friends to find the truth underneath these disguises. That is why we’re asking you to take a movie, a TV show or a some other event in your life and sit down with someone and talk about what values are being promoted there. You might be surprised. That’s why Helen is passing out some cards of that movie review I just told you about. We went through that movie scene by scene to talk about the values portrayed there.” http://peterandhelenevans.com/articles-JohnQ.html.”

One of the bad ideas out there is that it’s OK for the government to steal from some people and give to other people. This is usually called something like “social justice” or “being fair” or “spreading the wealth around.” It might even sound better if we call the giving “welfare” and the stealing “taxes on the rich.” But if we bring it into real life — it’s just wrong. Imagine this: here’s you, me and the other guy. It’s cold. I’ve got a coat. You’ve got no coat. The other guy’s got a closet full of coats. Is that fair? That’s just the reality. I want you to like me, so I take one of the other guy’s coats and give it to you. Is that fair? Now you’re warm, but you’re in possession of stolen property, the other guy’s been robbed, and I’m a thief. Is that what we want? I don’t think so.

So much is being trashed in the name of fairness. Now, let’s be clear, we really DO want things to be fair, we want people to be generous and helpful; that’s an important part of life. Let’s take back what it really means to be fair and giving; let’s not substitute stealing for giving; let’s tell the government to get back to its real Constitutional principles and stop making things up as it suits them.

Come November, there will be a lot more evidence that government is doing more harm than good. It will become progressively easier to show our families, friends and neighbors the truth that these interventionist, big-government policies are the wrong way to go.

It’s going to become so obvious that even politicians will start to notice. Let’s help them pay attention. Give them a call. Send them a letter. Tell your representative just one thing you want to see changed. Tell your families, friends and neighbors to tell their representatives. By 2010, we the people will have some real alternatives when we go to the polls. We’ve got to tell them — PROTECT OUR LIBERTY. PROTECT OUR SOVEREIGNTY. ENFORCE OUR LAWS. AND — STOP REWARDING FAILURE! NO MORE BAIL-OUTS!!

Will America Become a Kingdom of Darkness?

Why is America in a free fall? What can we do about it? These four sermons present a powerful case for how we have misunderstood the source of our problems. While many pointed the finger at President Bush, so now many point it at President Obama. But do we look only at human leaders because we no longer believe that evil has a supernatural dimension? Watching the horrors of Nazi Germany, C. S. Lewis warned against the dangers of dismissing the devil. Looking at modern America, Mangalwadi also points the way back to living and flourishing as a people under God.

Watch 5-minute video of Dr. Mangalwadi introducing the subject.

“Dr. Vishal Mangalwadi’s intelligent and refreshing insights peel back the political, social, and moral issues of America and reveal a deception that runs deeper than our sociocultural roots. No longer can we take America’s goodness for granted. In four lectures originally given at our church in May 2009, Mangalwadi left us asking if we will allow America to become a nation seduced by Satan or if we will learn from the past and take a stand for righteousness.”

—Pastor Duane Vander Klok, PhD, Resurrection Life Church, Grandville, Michigan

“Vishal has the courage to ask the tough questions and the rare ability to make the complex accessible to the masses. It is telling when I struggle with my kids over first dibs to his materials!” —Hank Hanegraaff, President of the Christian Research institute and host of the Bible Answer Man Broadcast

“Social Justice” Strikes Again

Obama administration violating separation of church and state, in the name of  ”Social Justice”

David Noebel sees a real violation of church and state unity:

I’ve been thinking … well, I’ve been reading and thinking. I’ve been reading Erwin Lutzer’s latest work, “When A Nation Forgets God: Seven Lessons We Must Learn From Nazi Germany.” Published by Moody Publishers, the Moody Church pastor analyses how the church in Germany fell under the sway of Adolf Hitler. Here’s the bad news: “By far the majority of the Lutheran churches sided with Hitler and his spectacular reforms.” The good news: “But a minority, under the leadership of Bonhoeffer and Niemoller, chose to pull away from the established church to form the ‘Confessing Church.’”

I find it disturbing that the Obama administration is trying to use churches, including evangelical churches, for its own political purposes.

The May 3, 2010, issue of The Weekly Standard carries an article by Meghan Clyne entitled “The Green Shepherd,” describing how the White House Office of Faith-Based and Neighborhood Partnerships is seeking to enroll gullible Christian churches in its efforts to control the climate – paraded under the guise of fighting poverty and injustice.

One of the “Green Shepherds” chosen by the Obama administration to deceive evangelicals is none other than the Rev. Jim Wallis!

Clyne’s article’s subtitle summarizes the administration’s underlying political goal: “The White House wants churches to advance its climate change agenda.” She points out that while Wallis wrote in December 2006 that “Republicans shamelessly politicized the faith-based initiative,” Wallis himself is now “a member of Obama’s faith-based council and has also met with congressional Democrats to help them frame their policies in more morally appealing terms.” These Wallis-trained Democrats will in turn make “inroads with religious voters.” Sound similar to Hitler’s making inroads with the Lutherans of his day?

Here is Students for a Democratic Society’s Jim Wallis, defender of Fidel Castro and a party to the proliferation of Communist revolutions throughout Central America, moving amongst the evangelicals and deceiving them left and left. Wallis has been a radical ever since he graduated from Michigan State University. (If you’re interested in more commentary on Wallis and his Sojourners magazine, see “Barack Obama’s ‘Red’ Spiritual Advisor” article on Summit Ministries’ website.)

Wallis’ ability to deceive reaches high into evangelical circles. For example, an article posted on the Sojourners blog entitled “Beyond Charity: Living a Life of Compassion and Justice” written by the wife of Willow Creek Pastor Bill Hybels says the following: “The battle against injustice is a tough and ugly war. While I am proud that Willow has entered that war, the truth is we have just begun to fight. … I look forward to the day when we as a church will be known for being the greenest church on the planet, not just because we enjoy the beauty of God’s creation, but because we know that climate change is a justice issue.” Included in her suggested reading list is Jim Wallis and his Sojourners magazine.

This idea that climate change is a justice/injustice issue is 100 percent in synch with the President’s Advisory Council on Faith-Based and Neighborhood Partnerships, which “envisions the ‘partnership’ between government and religious institutions as a means of spreading the administration’s environmental warnings, rather than just a way to help churches feed the hungry and clothe the poor.” No wonder Clyne closes her article with the comment, “Perhaps it’s only reasonable that global warming activists would turn to God for help as the scientific case for their position collapses.”

But let me be blunt and suggest that Mrs. Hybels would be better informed if she would read Theodore Dalrymple’s “Life at the Bottom,” Peter Bauer’s “Equality, the Third World, and Economic Delusion” and Thomas Sowell’s “Intellectuals and Society.”

In fact, if she were to read Sowell’s work she would discover at least one secret to lifting the poor out of poverty, which we can assume is her desire in attaining “social justice,” since she never clearly articulates what she means by the term. Writes Sowell, “Under new economic policies beginning in the 1990s, tens of millions of people in India have risen above that country’s poverty level. In China, under similar policies begun earlier, a million people a month have risen out of poverty.”

Unfortunately this is not welcomed news by the radical left because these economic policies are capitalistic and hence politically incorrect. Sowell quotes French writer Raymond Aron who admits that intellectuals want to see prosperity only “through State intervention” and “the revolutionary code” and hence are resentful over such capitalistic victories. Better poor under socialism than well off under capitalism seems to be their motto!

Indeed, a fellow lecturer told me of his recent trip to Cuba where “social justice” reigns supreme. Everyone in Cuba works for the government and receives $15 a month (doctors receive $18) which barely buys beans and rice and a little cooking oil. The 500 pastors he taught for a week said that Cuba today is an island prison and no one can escape. People are starving even though their waters are alive with fish, but no fishing boats are allowed since they would be used to escape from paradise to the evil United States.

This is the Cuba the Rev. Jim Wallis and his Sojourners crowd hold up as an example of “social justice.”

Big Lunar Eclipse on Saturday

This Saturday morning, June 26th, there’s going to be a lunar eclipse—and for many residents of the USA, it’s going to be a big one. Check it out on the NASA website. 

Metropolitan Jonah on the Manhattan Declaration

Metropolitan Jonah, Primate of the Orthodox Church in America, speaks about why he signed the Manhattan Declaration. For Orthodox Christians, the participation of Met. Jonah and other Orthodox leaders (see more interviews) represent an engagement with American culture that has been long in coming. We feel that Orthodox Christianity has much to offer American culture, and like Met. Jonah and others who embrace and support the principles expressed in the Declaration, we welcome the opportunity to make our faith known.

See more interviews with signers of the Manhattan Declaration.

Evangelical Declaration on Global Warming

The Cornwall Declaration on Environmental Stewardship

Download the Cornwall Declaration (pdf)
View a list of notable signers
Add your endorsement

The past millennium brought unprecedented improvements in human health, nutrition, and life expectancy, especially among those most blessed by political and economic liberty and advances in science and technology. At the dawn of a new millennium, the opportunity exists to build on these advances and to extend them to more of the earth’s people.

At the same time, many are concerned that liberty, science, and technology are more a threat to the environment than a blessing to humanity and nature. Out of shared reverence for God and His creation and love for our neighbors, we Jews, Catholics, and Protestants, speaking for ourselves and not officially on behalf of our respective communities, joined by others of good will, and committed to justice and compassion, unite in this declaration of our common concerns, beliefs, and aspirations.

Our Concerns

Human understanding and control of natural processes empower people not only to improve the human condition but also to do great harm to each other, to the earth, and to other creatures. As concerns about the environment have grown in recent decades, the moral necessity of ecological stewardship has become increasingly clear.

At the same time, however, certain misconceptions about nature and science, coupled with erroneous theological and anthropological positions, impede the advancement of a sound environmental ethic. In the midst of controversy over such matters, it is critically important to remember that while passion may energize environmental activism, it is reason—including sound theology and sound science—that must guide the decision-making process. We identify three areas of common misunderstanding:

Read the rest of the Declaration on the Cornwall Alliance website.

Anti-Human Philosophy from Singer and Benatar

Anti-Human Philosophy from Singer and Benatar

By E. Calvin Beisner, Ph.D.

David Benatar, with whose book Better Never to Have Been: The Harm of Coming into Existence Peter Singer here interacts, thinks the world would be better off without people. “Benatar claims, inter alia, that deliberate procreation is immoral; that abortion is morally mandatory if possible before approximately 30 weeks of gestation; and that the morally optimal size of the human population is ZERO,” writes one Amazon.com reviewer who calls the book “moral philosophy at its best.”

Singer has been well known as a leading anti-human philosopher for decades; now he has even more brutal company. As he writes in his review of Benatar’s book, Singer won’t go quite so far as Benatar. But Benatar goes all the way. There should be no humans.

One could respond by suggesting that if to come into existence is to do harm, then Benatar shouldn’t have come into existence, and the world would be better off without him spewing such “philosophy” (really thanatophilia, love not of philosophy but of death). But to do so would be to commit the same elementary logical fallacy Benatar, a philosopher who should have known better, commits: hasty generalization. Does everyone who comes into existence do harm? Yes. But many, perhaps all, who come into existence also do good. Benatar’s having chosen to live long enough to write his book suggests that he, at least, thought he could do more good than harm by not committing suicide first.

But this argument, while it reveals the self-refuting nature of Benatar’s (and Singer’s) reasoning, has the same weakness theirs has: it is fundamentally utilitarian, and utilitarianism is fundamentally irrational because it cannot justify any end and therefore cannot justify any means. Without divine revelation to give us both epistemic and ethical presuppositions, it is impossible to justify any conclusions at all.

And divine revelation tells us two things (among others) relevant to this issue: (1) Human beings are the image of God and therefore good and sacred in themselves, before reference to anything they do or don’t do. (2) The proper ends of human existence are not pleasure (which Benatar and Singer argue can’t be assured for anyone born, while pain can be assured) but virtue and the glory of God. “All those who hate me love death,” says Wisdom in Proverbs 8:36. Singer and Benatar hate Wisdom–not human wisdom, but divine Wisdom (1 Corinthians 1;18-24); it’s no surprise, therefore, that they love death.

Christianity is a spiritual path – part 2

“Reaction, Resentment, and Inner Stillness” – Part 2

Lenten Retreat with His Beatitude Metropolitan Jonah given at Saint Matthew Orthodox Church in Columbia, MD on March 13, 2010.
Please be patient while the audio file loads.

Listen here:

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.